data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0e66/e0e66c818cdba77d9ab7f4bb8b3fa691fad66dd6" alt=""
WEIGHT: 65 kg
Breast: Small
One HOUR:70$
NIGHT: +40$
Services: Facial, Anal Play, Toys, Rimming (receiving), Toys
To browse Academia. Richard Davenport-Hines' book examines attitudes towards sex and sexuality in Britain from the Renaissance to the late 20th century, focusing specifically on venereal diseases and homosexuality.
Despite its rich array of primary sources, the work is critiqued for lacking a cohesive narrative and broader contextualization, which diminishes its overall impact and clarity.
The review highlights both the valuable material presented and the shortcomings in the methodology and organization of the text. James R. New York and London: Routledge, ISBN Thomas Prasch Sex is what we make of it.
Sexuality may be natural, but its meanings are not. This article surveys the current literature on the histories of eighteenthcentury British demography, the family and affect, pornography, sexuality and gender, and argues that they are superficially contradictory. It suggests that demography and the histories of the family, affect and pornography present a liberationist narrative in which relations between men and women became more emotionally fulfilling, leading to more reproductive sex.
This is juxtaposed to the literature on gender and women's history, which depicts the period as characterized by an increasingly rigid and rigidly policed series of gender stereotypes and roles.