Searched over M research papers. Yo, let me break it down for ya. The big question is, do they really help in reducing poverty? Well, the research says, "Fo' shizzle! Both are good, but remittances seem to hit harder in reducing poverty. They reach more people and often come in higher amounts. Targeted transfers are like giving cash to those who need it the most, while universal ones spread the love to everyone. The trick is finding the right balance.
Conditional cash transfers are like, "You get this cash, but you gotta do something in return," like sending your kids to school. Programs targeting children, like the Child Support Grant in South Africa, have been super effective in reducing child poverty. In places like Brazil, cash transfers have helped reduce inequalities and improve access to health and education. Take Rwanda, for instance. In Kenya, cash transfers helped female-headed households improve their income and reduce poverty, contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals.
Cash transfers are more than just a quick fix. They empower people, improve social cohesion, and can even reduce stigma. So, in the words of Snoop Dogg, direct cash transfers are a solid way to help folks out of poverty.
They might not be the ultimate solution, but they sure do make a difference. Keep it real, and remember, a little cash can go a long way in making life better for those in need. Peace out! Do direct cash transfers reduce poverty? Targeted vs. Conditional vs. Unconditional Cash Transfers Conditional cash transfers are like, "You get this cash, but you gotta do something in return," like sending your kids to school. Real-World Examples Take Rwanda, for instance.
The Bigger Picture Cash transfers are more than just a quick fix. Conclusion So, in the words of Snoop Dogg, direct cash transfers are a solid way to help folks out of poverty. See sources. Sources and full results Most relevant research papers on this topic. DOI: Cash transfers, social protection and poverty reduction. Barrientos et al. The direct and indirect effect of cash transfers: the case of Indonesia.
